Thursday, November 10, 2022

oh no! not a mistake?!?

i wanted to make an edit to the pquestionnaire, because i completely forgot about this question that i wanted to add to it:

31. imagine there is a piece of information that you do not know about. if you did know it, it could risk darkening your worldview, mental/emotional state, or memories. there is nothing you can do to change it, and it does not directly impact your life, at least as far as affecting your actions. would you want to know about it, know that it existed but not know what it was, or not know that it existed at all?

Monday, November 7, 2022

pquestionnaire ii

 i think i might make this a tradition.


you (present or future) are welcome to answer any amount or combination of the questions, including all or none of them. in the event of ambiguity in the questions, you are welcome to interpret the questions however you choose. this survey will remain open, and i would be grateful for your thoughts regardless of timing; however, if you are answering this at the time of output, i would be especially grateful if i could receive answers by the end of 2022.
  1. who are you?
  2. what is your quest?
  3. who is God?
  4. how are you feeling right now?
  5. on a scale of 1-10, rate this year for you.
  6. what was your favorite part of this year?
  7. what was your least favorite part of this year?
  8. what is something you've been thinking about lately?
  9. what is something that confuses you?
  10. what is something you've discovered in the past year?
  11. how have you grown in the last year?
  12. what do you hope to do in the next year?
  13. how do you hope to grow in the next year?
  14. what is something you would like to learn?
  15. what is something that comes fairly naturally to you?
  16. what is something you struggle with?
  17. how should i strive to grow?
  18. if you could have me occupy any role in your life, what would that look like?
  19. what is something i do that makes you smile?
  20. what is something you would like more of in our friendship?
  21. what would a successful life look like for you?
  22. what is your favorite compliment you have received?
  23. what characteristics do you like and/or respect in a story?
  24. what is one characteristic that the world needs more of?
  25. what is something you would like to try sometime?
  26. what is a trip you would like to take, but haven't yet?
  27. what is a non-Bible book (or series) you would recommend to basically everyone?
  28. what is an item you have crossed off your bucket list OR what is a dream you've had that came true?
  29. what is something that blows your mind, or makes you feel extremely small, or extremely big, or otherwise inspires wonder and awe in you?
  30. what is one question you've had for a while, which you don't have an answer to?

Sunday, October 30, 2022

a reminder to the conflicted (aka me)

i am not aware of any place in Scripture that gives provision not to do a Good and Right Thing because it will require personal discomfort or sacrifice. in fact, increasingly, my understanding of the entire story supports the exact opposite of that.

Sunday, July 31, 2022

the fire

i sat there, contemplating the question.

are you the kind of Christian you want to be?

it's not like i live a life of disobedience. whenever aware of it, i do my best to live according to God's will.

but?

well, it all feels kind of empty, doesn't it? why am i exhausted all the time? why is it such a chore to get up in the morning? why do i spend so much time ruminating? why is everything so hard to do? and i struggle with grace, which is problematic considering, you know, the entire foundation of my faith.

"this i hold against you. you have forgotten the love you had at first."

hmm. i suppose. it's not like love and joy have been a big part of my fuel lately.

 

a pause.

 

you've been living in quite a lot of fear, wouldn't you say?

yes, i would say that. in fact, living "in" fear is true. it ranges from the smallest things, like fear of singing in front of others, to the most tremendous things, like the all-spanning fear of failure, which is the true source of many other fears, to the deepest things, like the fear of my own thoughts, to the insecure things, like my very personality.

 

another pause.

 

but a lot of those things are pretty well justified, right? there are pretty concrete reasons that they're there.

sure. but i don't want you to live in fear. does the reason for your fear justify your continuing to live in it?

no.

then you need to face them.

but how? i already tried that, remember? i was spiraling. i couldn't tell what was true. won't it make things worse again?

this time, you will rely on me. i will defend you. i will define your identity. i will sustain you. this is a spiritual battle--stop trying to win it by yourself.

ok. so crazy idea, i could make a list of every fear i can think of, and then systematically go through and take steps to face them. no more running away. i doubt whether it would eradicate them completely, but even if it doesn't, i would practice entrusting them to God, and relying on his strength and comfort. i mean, it's a start?


"if you try to do this without God, you will fail at everything."

yup, i can relate.

are you tired of failing?

yes.



"these things you believe about yourself are not true. they are lies."

"fear is the consequence of every lie"

"this is not the life that God wants for you."

"perfect love casts out fear"

"repent of this belief and stop arguing with God."

are you listening?


ok.

Thursday, July 28, 2022

doubt your doubts (aka the circular logic of trust issues)

there's an odd train of thought that's been passing through recently. it goes:

my trust has been broken by someone i believed to be trustworthy.

but this is a different person. a different situation. this person hasn't broken your trust. they are trustworthy.

yes, but that was what i believed about the last person, until they broke my trust.

so how do i know if i can really trust anyone? do i test people before trusting them with important things? do i have some kind of trust gauge that lets me know with what things i can trust someone? should i just never assume i can trust anyone?

the problem with that last thing is that trust is based on a lack of certainty. the trust is the test.

more practically, it's impossible to live a full life without trusting anyone. you can't function the way you're supposed to.

so what do i do with that?


and actually, it gets worse:

well i can trust God.

can i? let's not forget that he has not prevented any of this from happening. what if i were putting my trust into an entity that doesn't even exist?


you've probably realized the problem here. this has nothing to do with me trusting one person or another (although, i'm not totally convinced that i could fully mistrust everyone, even if i put my mind to do so). none of this reasoning has anything to do with the actual trustworthiness of any individual. the problem is my lack of trust in my own judgment. which, while it doesn't automatically change anything, is helpful to realize, as i can now cast myself as the unreliable narrator.

more importantly, it means that i am STILL. ASSUMING. RESPONSIBILITY. for a situation i did not cause and could not have avoided.

except . . . incidentally, by being less trusting?

Sunday, May 8, 2022

things i unambiguously want to be more habitually

  • kind
  • generous
  • empathetic
  • forgiving
  • compassionate
  • outward-focused
  • humble
  • brave
  • defenseless
  • curious
  • listenful

Wednesday, April 27, 2022

increasing awesome

i had a thought pass through the river of my mind recently, and it was so strange to me that i pulled it aside to examine it some more. the thought was this: what if life isn't just about avoiding negative outcomes?

lots of people live their lives this way, but it's so outside of my natural way of thinking that the prospect of thinking this way regularly is totally bonkers to me. i mean, isn't that basically just carelessness? of course we want to avoid negative outcomes, right?

sure, of course. but not just that. this most recent season has been tough because in a lot of ways, i've struggled to want things of my own volition. it seems to be getting a bit better now, but i've struggled to want to do things i used to like, want to have goals, want to hang out with people. i'll do things because it seems like i should, or because i know my state of mind will worsen if i don't, or because i will lose relationships if i don't. (that may seem extreme, but it's already happened.) like i am a slave, and my driver is Duty. it's all avoidance of the negative. i remember saying some months ago, "there's nothing i want to do, only things i don't want to do."

ultimately, i believe it's because i've been afraid to want, afraid to hope. the last time i wanted something so desperately that it shaped the way i made decisions, it led to suffering upon suffering (at the risk of sounding overly dramatic). so i think subconsciously, my brain may have been protecting me from that kind of pain by shutting down my wanter. i have struggled with feeling that my feelings are irrelevant--so why bother acknowledging or having them? my roommate said that that sounds like a painful way to live, and initially i agreed with her, but actually that's just the point. apathy is significantly less painful for me, and most days when i asked myself which i would prefer, i thought i would rather not feel anything at all.

but truthfully, that's no way to live. an engine cannot continue running with no fuel, and neither can a person. Mom (of all people!) said once that life is about taking risks, which is a quote that shouldn't be taken to extremes, but i still found it surprising.

"don't you just feel that way because of the rules instilled in you by your faith? isn't that the main thing that binds you to duty?"

i don't think so. Jesus said that we were "free indeed." he wants us to live joyfully, having life in full. the boundaries set are "in pleasant places." a life lived for him is a sacrifice, like a marriage is a sacrifice, but i don't believe it's just that. it's an acknowledgement that this choice is the better one.

i think that sometimes my brain clings to anxiety, to control, like a child clings to the monkey bars. as if by overthinking every possible scenario i could ever find myself in, i can have complete control over my future and avoid all unpleasantness. the lie is that control is attainable, even for a worrier. life isn't just about negating bad things, but also producing good things.

i am still struggling with the Biblical definition of freedom, because it is so different from our cultural conception of what freedom looks like. but the freedom that Christ offers is that of not having to hold onto control so tightly. because he is powerful, and because he cares for me and because he sees down to every intimate detail of my life, i can trust that just because something is out of my control does not mean that it is out of control.

Monday, April 25, 2022

individual freedom vs. social responsibility: pt ii

this is sort of an offshoot to the last topic, and a somewhat hotter take in my opinion, and it's a response to the mentality that says "i am not responsible for others' feelings."

which, like, yes. ultimately, each of us is responsible for what we do with our own thoughts and feelings. i think we are better off for thinking that way for ourselves--it shifts the locus of control in our favor. and also, it's important for your own sanity to realize when someone else's unreasonableness or overreaction is not your fault.

but we are responsible for the things we do that affect other people, and, to some degree, how they affect other people. my problem with this statement is that it's not a far leap from "i am not responsible for others' feelings," to "well it's not my fault you're responding in a hurt way to my choices." and that is blaming other people for their pain, which is the technical definition of a fartbag. if my default approach to life is that i can't be held responsible for the feelings of others, then it becomes very easy for me to go through life justifying the havoc i leave in my wake as i fail to empathize with them in the name of my own freedom. it is very easy to do this even without realizing that that's anything like what i'm doing.

perhaps an amended version of this statement could be "i am not responsible for what others do with their feelings,"?

to tie it back into my last post, if we accept the premise that we have some responsibility to other humans, it should not be a surprise or a wildly controversial statement that taking into consideration the feelings and struggles of those around us should be a fairly baseline responsibility to them.

but to what degree should this be taken? that, Detective, is the right question.

individual freedom vs. social responsibility

i may be out of line with all this, but i don't think i am.

the more i think about this, the more it seems obvious that the more you have responsibility, the less you are able to use your own individual freedom.

for example: if i work eight hours a day at a job, i am responsible to be there, to get the job done, to generally be a good employee, etc. i then no longer have the freedom for those eight hours to choose where i am or what i am doing. i have an obligation to fulfill to my boss, or my customers, or whomever. (it's also worth noting that in this situation, i am compensated in a way that makes it worthwhile to continue bearing the responsibility and forfeiting my freedom; namely, i get paid so that i can continue living. this is a relevant part of this topic, but not the central part right now.)

here's my hot take: i think we have failed when we stop viewing relationships as responsibilities.

in a working relationship, this is probably the most obvious, because it is relatively cut and dry. most of my responsibilities to the people i work with have to do with the job itself, and not so much with interpersonal dynamics.

however; there are social borders, which can be harder to define or navigate sometimes. it is a basic responsibility that you have to all people, whether you know them or not, to not murder them or steal from them, for example. it is a pretty basic responsibility you have to the people you interact with to maintain a baseline level of politeness and friendliness (in our society). but what are the exact borders of that? there is some grey area, and this may be one of the more clear-cut examples. do i have the individual freedom to swear in the privacy of my own home? technically yes. do i have the freedom to swear at frustrating customers or coworkers or students? no.

but then, there are other relationships which are more sticky. friends. family. old acquaintances. former friends. the rules are less universal, but may be more binding. do i have the freedom to swear around or at my friends and family? i mean, my relationships don't generally operate that way, but many do. can i spread gossip about my friends? about my family? probably not if i want to keep those relationships.

that actually leads to an important distinction. in most cases, technically, i have freedom to do whatever i want, but it may not benefit me to do so. can i skip work whenever i want so that i can stay home and watch tv? i mean, technically yes. but doing so will get me fired, probably. can i badmouth or betray my friends and family? sure, but that will result in lost friends and poisoned familial relationships.

so here's a thought experiment. there is something i can do which i know will hurt someone i know, but is socially acceptable, and possibly even within my right to do. it is an expression of my freedom, but is not necessary. do i have the freedom if that hurt person is just some rando on the street? a coworker? an acquaintance? a close friend? a family member?

this is a rhetorical question; my point is that the answer may change depending on the relationship. relationships come with responsibilities, whether we want to believe it or not. in a world where you need to interact with other people, there is no such thing as absolute freedom. that would be anarchy. there is nothing freer than being alone, but that does not mean it is the best way.

so to whom are we responsible, and for what?

that, Detective, is the right question.

Friday, March 25, 2022

outcry

it kind of seems like i've become deeply, desperately, secretly afraid of abandonment. which, given my aforementioned fear of loneliness and certain events of the past couple of years, makes sense. sometimes it's difficult not to believe that sooner or later, everyone i care about will leave me.

and then i wrestle with certain parts of my personality. like, maybe i'm not fun enough, or maybe i don't stand out enough, or i take life too seriously, or expect too much of people, or am too high maintenance, or don't communicate enough, or am not interesting enough, and like, that's why someone would leave? like some weak, lukewarm tea that someone started drinking and then forgot about.

and also, maybe the reason that i gravitate so much toward shows and podcasts and get so invested in the characters/hosts is because they sort of act as a substitute for real life relationships, but they require less investment, and they won't leave if i disappoint them, and are accessible at any time.

and so when you say "I will never leave or forsake you," sometimes i struggle against it. not that i want to disbelieve it, but like. what if i'm just imagining someone who truly knows me, who will never leave? if that happened, i don't know if i could handle it. lately, sometimes it's hard to differentiate what is true from what isn't. what if this were just another instance of me believing something primarily because it's convenient for me (i mean, not that it is, broadly, which is worth noting)? why doesn't your presence help me feel less alone or sad, or more energized or motivated or certain?

on the other hand, what if my cynicism is the thing that keeps me from feeling the full effects of what is really there? i want to let you in. maybe it's just fear that keeps you at arms' length.

Thursday, March 24, 2022

the thing with feathers

sometimes choosing hope puts you at a disadvantage. another person may have selfish motives and take advantage of you. or they may fail you. or maybe your dreams don't pan out the way you wanted them to. maybe logic seems to point to the improbability of a positive future. maybe motivation is difficult to find. maybe it's harder to invest time and energy into things than it once was. maybe it can become difficult to enjoy the things you normally like. maybe it can be difficult to rediscover what refuels you. maybe even the simplest, most basic of hopes can seem out of reach. it hurts so much more to hope and then be let down than to curb your expectations from the start . . . doesn't it?

even so, i think hope always is, and always must be, the correct answer.

Sunday, January 30, 2022

merely human

in the deepest, most destructive pain, there is no nobility. not really. there may be a determination, a decision, to act in integrity, but in the core of the pain, one desire exists, and that is for the pain to end. so even when a heart that has been torn to shreds knows that it will come back stronger, it is small comfort in the face of the present pain, no matter how valuable the outcome.

Lord, help me.

Tuesday, January 25, 2022

the pervasive root system of fear

it's a trend worthy of attention that when i experience a feeling which might reasonably be described as "anxious," it usually traces its roots down to my widest-spanning fear, which is failure, and that when i experience a different feeling which might reasonably be described as "depressed," (if it isn't "anxious" in a mask and trench coat, which it is a surprising amount of the time) it usually traces its roots down to my deepest fear, which is perpetual loneliness.

since i first made this observation, i have been finding it to be an extremely helpful analytical shortcut. it helps me to get closer to understanding exactly what i'm dealing with.

Tuesday, January 18, 2022

sides

blue and red and black and white and brown and yellow

there are no things on which we agree, save one: the Other side is, well, “other,” and therefore wrong and stupid. even those of us who claim to take no sides do so on the premise that both sides are idiots. and it’s much more important to point out all the ways in which the Others are wrong and stupid than it is to spend any precious “debate” time on how either view might benefit All.

we have ears, but we do not hear. we are not being heard—maybe if we just shout louder. why aren’t we getting through?!?!?

but who needs to hear what the Others have to say? They do not present the Truth; They have ulterior motives, They are entrenched in conspiracy, They are hopelessly selfish, They are misguided and blind at best. We alone are in possession of all the true facts. why should We give Them the time of day?

all of history has led up to Us, the ones who finally Understand. We were born into just the right circumstances to have a grasp on what’s really going on.

perhaps you read this and have identified Them. everything i’ve said points to Them. or maybe i’m one of Them. after all, have i even told you in this a single thing i stand for? no, i couldn’t possibly be. you like me too much.

Sunday, January 2, 2022

a biblical look at the language of friendship

[note: this was originally written as an article for the Socially Distanced Intellectuals, though it was never actually published. regardless, i've re-formatted it for this space, since it fits thematically and is very important to me.]


"My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends. You are my friends if you do what I command. I no longer call you servants, because a servant does not know his master’s business. Instead, I have called you friends, for everything that I learned from my Father I have made known to you." - John 15:12-15



for the past several months, i’ve been thinking about what true friendship looks like, so i started a project: looking up all the times the Bible translates the word “friend,” and comparing the words originally used. i was hoping that i could get a better grasp on different types of friendship. in the end, it wasn’t quite as cut and dry as i’d hoped, as there are 13 different words that the ESV translates as “friend,” 52 times, and over a wide variety of contexts. you’ll be glad to hear that i’m not going to cite all 52 uses here. instead, i’ve been looking for overarching themes in them, as well as narrative examples that support them. obviously this is not going to be definitive or exhaustive, but there are three themes that stand out to me as being repeated over and over again: trustworthiness, kindness, and loyalty.

now, when i say trustworthiness, i do mean honesty, but in the broader sense, i mean that really good friends push one another toward growth. it’s not just speaking truth, but living a lifestyle of integrity to the truth which you profess. the Hebrew word for this kind of trustworthiness is emet, the noun form of the verb aman--to put one’s trust in. emet often translates to the English words “faithfulness” or “truth.” Biblically, this often manifests in honesty, even--maybe especially--when it is unpleasant to hear. Proverbs 27 has a lot to say on friendship, including, “Faithful [emet] are the wounds of a friend [ahab]; profuse are the kisses of an enemy.” this isn’t referring to just any wound, but specifically a truth that is painful to hear. though it may hurt in the moment, telling a friend a difficult truth is best for them in the long run because it pushes them to grow. this word for friend, ahab, is usually specifically used to indicate a friendship of affectionate love; so basically, if you truly love someone, you will push them toward truth. the opposite of this kind of loving friendship are the “kisses of an enemy,” or, as it is put later in the same chapter, “words of a flatterer,” indicating that an enemy may tell someone only what they want to hear in order to garner that person’s favor. telling hard truths is, ultimately, a selfless act because it seeks the other person’s good at the potential risk of being misunderstood or seen in a poor light.

this same proverb goes on to affirm that “oil and perfume make the heart glad, and the sweetness of a friend [rea] is in his earnest counsel.” rea is the most common word for friend in the Old Testament, and is used pretty generally; it can mean anything from neighbor to intimate friend. so basically, it’s just as general as our word for a friend. but the testing of such a relationship is in whether a person provides trustworthy counsel. love does not simply tell a friend what they want to hear; it pushes a friend toward the God of truth. of course hard truths will be difficult to receive! but such counsel can be trusted because it comes from someone who is looking out for your ultimate good. we can see this demonstrated in the relationship between Paul and Timothy. in his letter to the Philippians, Paul writes, “I hope in the Lord Jesus to send Timothy to you soon, so that I too may be cheered by news of you. For I have no one like him, who will be genuinely concerned for your welfare. For they all seek their own interests, not those of Jesus Christ. But you know Timothy's proven worth, how as a son with a father he has served with me in the gospel.” as someone who has worked closely with Timothy, Paul is in an ideal position to vouch for his character. unlike others, Timothy proves his love for others by directing them toward Christ instead of focusing on his own interests. it is this trustworthiness that not only makes him invaluable to the ministry, but puts him in a position for Paul to trust him implicitly. it is this type of friendship, the “iron sharpens iron” sort of Proverbs 27, that is best equipped to reveal God’s character.

now, in all this talk about honesty, it can be easy to get a little carried away and forget that part of friendship is being kind. Job’s friends are maybe most famous for botching this. though they initially come to comfort him, their “counsel” quickly turns into baseless attacks on his character, alleging that if God is just, Job’s suffering must be a result of his own sin and attempts to hide it. Job calls them out multiple times throughout their discourse. “He who withholds kindness [hesed] from a friend [rea] forsakes the fear of the Almighty,” he tells them. “You would even cast lots over the fatherless and bargain over your friend [rea].” they are so cold and hard-hearted that the bond of friendship has come to make no difference in their dealings with him. though they are present with him and believe they are giving him sound counsel, they fail to support him in his grief and actually engage with his struggle. on the other hand, Proverbs 22 elevates the type of friend who “loves purity of heart, and whose speech is gracious [hen].” hen can translate roughly as “favor” or “grace,”and is the noun form of the verb hanan. a good friend speaks with grace, and does not disparage his friend's character.

but hold on, we need to back up a little here. i was going to filter down a more specific definition for kindness, but it turns out to have a (not all that) surprising relationship with another essential characteristic for a friend: loyalty. if you’ve been paying close attention, you may have noticed that i cited a word which i did not define, so i will do so now. “kindness,” or “lovingkindness,” as some versions put it, is translated from the Hebrew word hesed. this word also frequently translates to “faithfulness,” “steadfast love,” or “loyalty.” so you could argue that it’s the same concept. but in our culture today, “kindness” has a rather different connotation from “loyalty.” one describes action and speech; the other describes a deep level of commitment. one conjures up warm fuzzies, while the other sits with another during times of trial. so for our language, you could say that they are two sides of the same coin. yet the Bible does not differentiate them. instead, here’s a different definition of a deeper loyalty for our modern Western brains. Proverbs 17 and 18 describe a friend as someone who “loves at all times” and is “born for adversity,” who stays near in times of trouble, and who “sticks closer than a brother.” Psalm 35 describes a friend as one who grieves on behalf of his friend’s pain. in all of these examples, friendship is described as a “through thick and thin” kind of affair. it’s not merely convenient, and not simply something to be enjoyed when it’s easy to do so; rather, the heart of it is that friends would face difficulties together, and that their best interests are intertwined with one another. Ecclesiastes 4 emphasizes it more fully: "Two are better than one, because they have a good reward for their toil. For if they fall, one will lift up his fellow. But woe to him who is alone when he falls and has not another to lift him up! Again, if two lie together, they keep warm, but how can one keep warm alone? And though a man might prevail against one who is alone, two will withstand him--a threefold cord is not quickly broken." admittedly, i'm taking some liberties with the application of this passage; it is often applied in the context of a marriage, but there is nothing in the passage that specifically links it to that, and i see no reason why it need be read as that specific. it’s an unusually practical view of what a friendship looks like, but that’s the very thing that makes it significant: it’s taken as a given--even part of the purpose of the relationship--that friends carry their burdens together. the fact is, we do sometimes fall, face unbearable cold, or face other situations that cannot be withstood alone. but in the context of friendship, these situations do not leave us in hopelessness and despair. moreover, the cord of three strands is often interpreted as God being interwoven into the relationship, making it strong and durable--kind of like a covenant.

in fact, the idea of friendship being a covenant relationship is not merely speculation. the Hebrew word for “covenant” is the word berit, and it can refer to different kinds of relationships: alliances between men, friendships between men, constitutions between leaders and their subjects, pledges between a man and a woman (as in a marriage covenant), or pledges between men and God. given the various kinds of covenants that are covered under the same word, it can get confusing quickly, but the very idea of loyalty in a friendship suggests that there is a mutual understanding of the relationship to which both people are agreeing, and we see this demonstrated in multiple instances in the Bible. Psalm 55 is a lament from the perspective of a man who was betrayed by a friend: “For it is not an enemy who taunts me--then I could bear it; it is not an adversary who deals insolently with me--then I could hide from him. But it is you, a man, my equal, my companion, my familiar friend. We used to take sweet counsel together; within God’s house we walked in the throng . . . My companion stretched out his hand against his friends; he violated his covenant [berit].” the covenant in this case seems to be more than a formal agreement; rather it suggests emotional intimacy originally built on the foundation of a common faith. this, of course, would be a much more damaging break than that of a simple acquaintanceship, for example. but for a more specific and encouraging example, we can look to one of the most well-known Biblical examples of friendship: David and Jonathan. the first time we see them interact with one another, the Bible describes their souls being knit together in love, and they make a covenant. as a sign of this covenant, Jonathan gives David his robe, armor, belt, sword, and bow, a sign of utmost loyalty. throughout their friendship, Jonathan’s father, King Saul, became jealous of David and sought his life. in all this, Jonathan opposed his father and risked his own life to stop him, and to protect David. he even made another covenant with David before God, recognizing him as the future king over Israel, with Jonathan himself at his right hand. unfortunately, this vision never came to pass. both Jonathan and Saul died in battle, and David went into public mourning and wrote a lament for them, in which he paid particular homage to Jonathan and their relationship:

“Jonathan lies slain on your high places.
I am distressed for you, my brother Jonathan;
very pleasant you have been to me;
your love to me was extraordinary,
surpassing the love of women.”


David never forgot Jonathan or the covenants he made with him. some time after he became king, David sought out Jonathan’s family, and found out that Jonathan had one son left, Mephibosheth, who led a humble life because he was crippled in his feet. remembering his dedication to Jonathan, he took in Mephibosheth to eat at his own table and gave him everything he had inherited from Saul. David’s loyalty to Jonathan was not just for life, but extended forward into future generations.

i don’t think that it’s any coincidence that trustworthiness, kindness, and loyalty--three central parts of friendship--are all part of how God calls the Church to interact with one another. Paul writes this to the Galatians: "Brothers, if anyone is caught in any transgression, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness. Keep watch on yourself, lest you too be tempted. Bear one another's burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ.” the focus of this passage is for members of the Church, emphasizing that we should protect the integrity of one another and ourselves. and yet, this message is delivered in a spirit of kindness. woven throughout it all is the loyalty that is central to such a relationship—that of bearing one another’s burdens, even as though they were our own. as we grow toward God in these ways, we are better able to embody true friendship. which makes sense, really, because these are traits which define his own character. God is described throughout the Bible as “merciful and gracious [hannun, from hanan], slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love [hesed] and faithfulness [emet].” friendship is a gift and a covenant, and as we strive to embody it better, we can be comforted by remembering that God himself embodied it first, and strengthened by being the recipients of his loving friendship.